Taz Mangus
Apr 20, 08:00 PM
I live in a country of excess. Excuse me if I don't weep at night because Kanye West or Lil Wayne are missing out on my $1+ for their songs.
If an artist isn't mainstream, I'll gladly pay for their music to support it. But since my musical tastes tend to gravitate towards major artists, I don't think twice when I torrent their albums.
![Vanessa Hudgens Hair Style vanessa hudgens hair up. Vanessa Hudgens Hair Style](//2.bp.blogspot.com/_7bTLuiStujE/S63wbvXE0UI/AAAAAAAABR0/sbrFH5SLTnI/s1600/vanessa_hudgens_2009_hairstyles.jpg)
Vanessa Hudgens Hair Style
![vanessa hudgens hair up. vanessa hudgens hair up. vanessa hudgens hair up.](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEglEhyDMgkqDzrwh6dVnw6tHGyC1C3dYBsT20XP73v9u9G4krBlpH7i9VxHPeWsM_5NtKMf8P8i-t3b6DV0t5R1tkFZ8Swt5tklcAguFfkLkDO9Zd2t2zi8jYZxHxWVLLNThIbjAYfZxfo/s1600/hudgens-the-hottie.jpg)
vanessa hudgens hair up.
![What#39;s Vanessa Hudgens#39; vanessa hudgens hair up. What#39;s Vanessa Hudgens#39;](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_s4lij2vlSo6p-LWlHEXkP7m9TXCk7OhX9rhzkWbpVfZn9pRd51CK24EDRjd35oA_DBzwFbnXl95kHL-tHmdE1VGYLGKx0YhkvDi9JBcuTDWI7eu1NDvJb1z_aLXY6XT6HLvrsu_QRmHtAtVIOb8DkKiuK-_xKb3lIM_1I=s0-d)
What#39;s Vanessa Hudgens#39;
![vanessa hudgens hairstyles up vanessa hudgens hair up. vanessa hudgens hairstyles up](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgdebOqzE4HjRnFl4EMO-TJM7JE9tF4FF1cK7lt_VnES3F3a1x42k-CwuPgS9t-Rm4KFU0dAqfZ_zGRFc4Of3TmkW_XEWiYAguz0gdF9hmmw8y1vsDdtVEnRDcE-_r2ph58dYpz9wLAz8rv/s400/vanessa_hudgens.jpg)
vanessa hudgens hairstyles up
![what is vanessa hudgens hair vanessa hudgens hair up. what is vanessa hudgens hair](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_s0A1YQVu6nmFNma4-LTx1jFh4GnhXl6bPbYnb0tdcBlkIIpYTSKqVr-Nhw2WKc4eCOqFfYjHo2JXg9g1aagOKelh81E5ukV6U2uaOzwKcvc7z-bCpwvypkv07-SJL0VBJm=s0-d)
what is vanessa hudgens hair
![Who Looked Better: Vanessa vanessa hudgens hair up. Who Looked Better: Vanessa](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_s52YAFn_H2ExyEx6Qh9mW-BWUYBgOE0q8DLB9CIlkNMfWmRcWwz7_-otHVPodJoPLU3dOa1Z-x4PJaSGIVOlRY1wcgxf9mrOAYuwRRAYuXqseJHuHDCFoG=s0-d)
Who Looked Better: Vanessa
![vanessa hudgens hair 2009. vanessa hudgens hair up. vanessa hudgens hair 2009.](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgBqvwnRTSLXAzg2VcvPaWf0tBVEXO_lKY7LbCdMeXjlM_fa68OZxk4oy0vj0WjWoKYJM7g3hSty6EaLmLlvQLAuOWwZP8_aLtkvzj4LM22U7Cyno1YtuKesXinlvPBHTyVUbvgCcmZQakv/s1600/vanessa-hudgens-long-cury-hairstyle-hair-extensions.jpg)
vanessa hudgens hair 2009.
![vanessa hudgens hair up. vanessa hudgens hair up. vanessa hudgens hair up.](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_vh9gJSEE4z8CcXnMpvyUhaf-Ytmpwq3IBWS5r7oUVEe7gC7KSR9iOLPiQp_WiWF0B0FZhshoMFAmCrHgW38ZzQj5SEP_uUHfbUeA2Nd-9TDmowQFLCFQH5oDTjBnd94eTs0cS7ZXAlW2ErrG41ivZzrSuMjexnwAHDW_buL9Pu=s0-d)
vanessa hudgens hair up.
![Black Hair With Cherry Red vanessa hudgens hair up. Black Hair With Cherry Red](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_txtG6ZYamnT5OM8C-W0nv94owG25Zgt07WSFP0Tb34OUHaEZzCOoqnuKT8zrklzm6HDcA-lD6PP148LeKMnhAqk-kI7qsbfPpVDuWqQBqXyWL2vwRtJ62rinWtsao-dJWaayzRB_bSbsGMrDtEdDKRAkkacRXj6OKYHOH6FJYFadOevpJK=s0-d)
Black Hair With Cherry Red
![vanessa hudgens hair up. vanessa hudgens hair up. vanessa hudgens hair up.](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_tlMrrClPzrZcpcR6PV4C072pJipoUOC44qz7f_RZnGjt9oeuoBT_ijx0VQUuL4XMU4KbxBwnfpkSATl0406fRwbd4WKLdUqVAmKsVy7LAxRRVyBd24Io9j6_kO9WAYCiJEq5FIdLdFF5aNQn2JWWL3NDWXzMgFh6E=s0-d)
vanessa hudgens hair up.
![vanessa hudgens hair 2011. vanessa hudgens hair up. vanessa hudgens hair 2011.](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgPyErnmT7woEBx9yP6aN-L5BvndeYSMWIyl_O1uot7LrJNQ5QiMoNu1N7ZmfwnpMuF61sMhBqI8pBLweY6DHo6CTc-w6ADeTW3fSse5gAl8J9Gjy9BPoXIWy2A2aY2UzxVvjSOvOKm9mR0/s1600/Hair%2525252BUpdos%2525252B-%2525252BVanessa%2525252BHudgens%2525252BCurly%2525252BUpdos.jpg)
vanessa hudgens hair 2011.
![Vanessa showed some leg in vanessa hudgens hair up. Vanessa showed some leg in](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_syDT60zBIizEslAi6JKX3EemRWOqh-QA8ToOUffeshZ7pkAU7ABjCjA69GMI2nmTe10Ygm45zUmxeEXl4b8iObuYmshv-HdhQtVG_Putt4WAkexi0u1uE9RGconQTC5umbGMzwzowpqwW64qiJHanvrfO0N9WxYHZKYQ=s0-d)
Vanessa showed some leg in
If an artist isn't mainstream, I'll gladly pay for their music to support it. But since my musical tastes tend to gravitate towards major artists, I don't think twice when I torrent their albums.
![Vanessa Hudgens Hair Style vanessa hudgens hair up. Vanessa Hudgens Hair Style](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_7bTLuiStujE/S63wbvXE0UI/AAAAAAAABR0/sbrFH5SLTnI/s1600/vanessa_hudgens_2009_hairstyles.jpg)
the Rebel
Mar 20, 10:12 PM
Personally, I stand for moral relativism every day. It is more important to me that individuals make decisions based on what they feel - individually - are right and wrong. I am glad that some here believe blindly following the "law" keeps them safe both morally and in the eyes of our fine government.
But let me ask you this... in your soul (if you believe in such things), do you really believe it is "wrong" to purchase a song off the iTMS without DRM? I am all for breaking the "law" as long as you know the consequences.
Those arguing for the supremacy of "laws" over moral reason simply hide the fact that they are dividing humans from one another. If you choose to abide by a law, do so. But do not confuse your knowledge of what the law states with a morally superior stance. Your morals are good for you and no one else.
So if my morality tells me that it is right for me to kill you, then you support my choice to do so?
But let me ask you this... in your soul (if you believe in such things), do you really believe it is "wrong" to purchase a song off the iTMS without DRM? I am all for breaking the "law" as long as you know the consequences.
Those arguing for the supremacy of "laws" over moral reason simply hide the fact that they are dividing humans from one another. If you choose to abide by a law, do so. But do not confuse your knowledge of what the law states with a morally superior stance. Your morals are good for you and no one else.
So if my morality tells me that it is right for me to kill you, then you support my choice to do so?
![vanessa hudgens hair up. vanessa hudgens hair up. vanessa hudgens hair up.](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEglEhyDMgkqDzrwh6dVnw6tHGyC1C3dYBsT20XP73v9u9G4krBlpH7i9VxHPeWsM_5NtKMf8P8i-t3b6DV0t5R1tkFZ8Swt5tklcAguFfkLkDO9Zd2t2zi8jYZxHxWVLLNThIbjAYfZxfo/s1600/hudgens-the-hottie.jpg)
myamid
Sep 12, 06:27 PM
If it did support HD??
thats kinda stupid considering it has HDMI and component connectors.
Well I had an old Toshiba TV with component in and it sure as hell wasn't an HDTV set... So component and HDTV are NOT interdependant...
The HDMI on the other hand is a good point, but it can still be used for SDTV so it's no a proof in itself (although I'll admit, it's certainly possible). My guess is that it's more an insurance policy for the future if Apple needs to protect the content from being "ripped"...
thats kinda stupid considering it has HDMI and component connectors.
Well I had an old Toshiba TV with component in and it sure as hell wasn't an HDTV set... So component and HDTV are NOT interdependant...
The HDMI on the other hand is a good point, but it can still be used for SDTV so it's no a proof in itself (although I'll admit, it's certainly possible). My guess is that it's more an insurance policy for the future if Apple needs to protect the content from being "ripped"...
bugfaceuk
Apr 9, 09:12 AM
I liked reading your post. I pretty much agree with you wrote. I think Nintendo is scared about the falling price of software. That's where their money comes from. For almost three decades, Nintendo has been making a lot of money by releasing consoles to sell their software at a premium.
An excellent example... is Urban Champion on Wiiware really worth $5?
That's madness! A title like that would get crushed on the iTunes App Store.
Although... I think iOS is geared more towards casual games, because that's easier to create on the system. Yet, I'm investing time and money in seeing if there is a market for "hardcore" games. I think there is. That's why I'm building BOT (http://photics.com/bot-game-design-and-progress-reports).
Apple is one step away from crushing Nintendo... that's adding an App Store to the Apple TV.
This hardcore vs. casual debate misses the main point. Nintendo was seen as the more casual of the big three console makers. Yet, Nintendo dominated the first few years of this generation's console war. If Apple enters this arena, it's big trouble for Nintendo... and the other console makers.
Heh, but as a developer, it's really cool for me. Apple has built something amazing here. Microsoft, Sony, Nintendo... they could have made it easier for independent developers, but they didn't. Apple is now in a great position to dramatically change the way the industry works � and I think it's for the better.
I wandered into Best Buy last Christmas season and I saw the game of life in 3D on the XBOX. I thought it was a great way to modernize a classic game. I was getting ready to buy the XBOX 360. But then, lots of great iOS games started going on sale for 99� each. I bought nine... NINE NEW GAMES for less than $10.
If Nintendo doesn't adapt, it could be big trouble for them. I've seen the 3DS (http://photics.com/nintendo-3ds-a-surprising-disappointment) and I'm not impressed. I think the iPhone 4 is a much better portable gaming machine.
Dude, Nintendo is not about to be crushed by Apple. That suggest a REAL lack of understanding about any market, let alone this one and this player.
Nintendo does need to adapt, but it could do that in a number of ways that would see it remain successful and a core contributor. I happen to believe their core competence is in developing games, and they would be well served on iOS.
I'm sorry, I don't judge the quality of a game by how cheap it is. EVEN IF YOU PUT IT IN CAPS.
An excellent example... is Urban Champion on Wiiware really worth $5?
That's madness! A title like that would get crushed on the iTunes App Store.
Although... I think iOS is geared more towards casual games, because that's easier to create on the system. Yet, I'm investing time and money in seeing if there is a market for "hardcore" games. I think there is. That's why I'm building BOT (http://photics.com/bot-game-design-and-progress-reports).
Apple is one step away from crushing Nintendo... that's adding an App Store to the Apple TV.
This hardcore vs. casual debate misses the main point. Nintendo was seen as the more casual of the big three console makers. Yet, Nintendo dominated the first few years of this generation's console war. If Apple enters this arena, it's big trouble for Nintendo... and the other console makers.
Heh, but as a developer, it's really cool for me. Apple has built something amazing here. Microsoft, Sony, Nintendo... they could have made it easier for independent developers, but they didn't. Apple is now in a great position to dramatically change the way the industry works � and I think it's for the better.
I wandered into Best Buy last Christmas season and I saw the game of life in 3D on the XBOX. I thought it was a great way to modernize a classic game. I was getting ready to buy the XBOX 360. But then, lots of great iOS games started going on sale for 99� each. I bought nine... NINE NEW GAMES for less than $10.
If Nintendo doesn't adapt, it could be big trouble for them. I've seen the 3DS (http://photics.com/nintendo-3ds-a-surprising-disappointment) and I'm not impressed. I think the iPhone 4 is a much better portable gaming machine.
Dude, Nintendo is not about to be crushed by Apple. That suggest a REAL lack of understanding about any market, let alone this one and this player.
Nintendo does need to adapt, but it could do that in a number of ways that would see it remain successful and a core contributor. I happen to believe their core competence is in developing games, and they would be well served on iOS.
I'm sorry, I don't judge the quality of a game by how cheap it is. EVEN IF YOU PUT IT IN CAPS.
![vanessa hudgens hairstyles up vanessa hudgens hair up. vanessa hudgens hairstyles up](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgdebOqzE4HjRnFl4EMO-TJM7JE9tF4FF1cK7lt_VnES3F3a1x42k-CwuPgS9t-Rm4KFU0dAqfZ_zGRFc4Of3TmkW_XEWiYAguz0gdF9hmmw8y1vsDdtVEnRDcE-_r2ph58dYpz9wLAz8rv/s400/vanessa_hudgens.jpg)
840quadra
Apr 28, 08:17 AM
You don't get it.
Please elaborate LTD.
Please elaborate LTD.
MorphingDragon
May 2, 10:02 AM
This is exactly the kind of ignorance I'm referring to. The vast majority of users don't differentiate between "virus", "trojan", "phishing e-mail", or any other terminology when they are actually referring to malware as "anything I don't want on my machine." By continuously bringing up inane points like the above, not only are you not helping the situation, you're perpetuating a useless mentality in order to prove your mastery of vocabulary.
Congratulations.
Stupid people will be venerable to malicious intent no matter what the form or operating system. I find *nix has no viruses tune wholly justified until reality differs.
Congratulations.
Stupid people will be venerable to malicious intent no matter what the form or operating system. I find *nix has no viruses tune wholly justified until reality differs.
EricNau
Sep 21, 05:00 PM
Hey, I watch the Food Network! Iron Chef rocks and Rachael Ray is a kitchen fox! Are those on the iTS?
-Clive
No. :(
-Clive
No. :(
![vanessa hudgens hair 2009. vanessa hudgens hair up. vanessa hudgens hair 2009.](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgBqvwnRTSLXAzg2VcvPaWf0tBVEXO_lKY7LbCdMeXjlM_fa68OZxk4oy0vj0WjWoKYJM7g3hSty6EaLmLlvQLAuOWwZP8_aLtkvzj4LM22U7Cyno1YtuKesXinlvPBHTyVUbvgCcmZQakv/s1600/vanessa-hudgens-long-cury-hairstyle-hair-extensions.jpg)
iJohnHenry
Apr 26, 08:26 AM
One of my thoughts on why people follow a religion are that they were raised with it, so it becomes a tradition.
That would not be my word of choice.
Brainwashing or indoctrination comes closer to the mark.
That would not be my word of choice.
Brainwashing or indoctrination comes closer to the mark.
Pants
Oct 9, 11:13 AM
Originally posted by gopher
Maybe we have, but nobody has provided compelling evidence to the contrary. The Mac hardware is capable of 18 billion floating calculations a second. Whether the software takes advantage of it that's another issue entirely. If someone is going to argue that Macs don't have good floating point performance, just look at the specs. If they really want good performance and aren't getting it they need to contact their favorite developer to work with the specs and Apple's developer relations. Apple provides the hardware, it is up to developer companies to utilize the hardware the best way they can. If they can't utilize Apple's hardware to its most efficient mode, then they should find better developers.
If you are going to complain that Apple doesn't have good floating point performance, don't use a PC biased spec like Specfp. Go by actual floating point calculations a second.
Nobody has shown anything to say that PCs can do more floating point calculations a second. And until someone does I stand by my claim.
ahhhh...so to get performance from the damned thing, I have to write arcane altivec code yes? well, sorry, I and many like me, neither have the time nor the patience to hand wring performance like this. Jeez, the days of hand optimising code are thankfully long gone, except, it seems with a g4. And we have to of course assume that even this mythical 18 million flops is based on the assumption that we can get the altivec unit supplied with data? hmm... This is not acceptable - spec fp biased? well, yeah, because it doesnt justify your end argument - the fact that most other companies are 'happy' to stand by it is merely justification for its 'biased' nature yeah?
hmm.....
Maybe we have, but nobody has provided compelling evidence to the contrary. The Mac hardware is capable of 18 billion floating calculations a second. Whether the software takes advantage of it that's another issue entirely. If someone is going to argue that Macs don't have good floating point performance, just look at the specs. If they really want good performance and aren't getting it they need to contact their favorite developer to work with the specs and Apple's developer relations. Apple provides the hardware, it is up to developer companies to utilize the hardware the best way they can. If they can't utilize Apple's hardware to its most efficient mode, then they should find better developers.
If you are going to complain that Apple doesn't have good floating point performance, don't use a PC biased spec like Specfp. Go by actual floating point calculations a second.
Nobody has shown anything to say that PCs can do more floating point calculations a second. And until someone does I stand by my claim.
ahhhh...so to get performance from the damned thing, I have to write arcane altivec code yes? well, sorry, I and many like me, neither have the time nor the patience to hand wring performance like this. Jeez, the days of hand optimising code are thankfully long gone, except, it seems with a g4. And we have to of course assume that even this mythical 18 million flops is based on the assumption that we can get the altivec unit supplied with data? hmm... This is not acceptable - spec fp biased? well, yeah, because it doesnt justify your end argument - the fact that most other companies are 'happy' to stand by it is merely justification for its 'biased' nature yeah?
hmm.....
flopticalcube
Apr 15, 01:06 PM
True Christians know that they are no longer subject to the laws associated with the Davidic covenant. Jesus Christ instituted a new covenant, which does not condone death for any person for any crime. So to directly answer your question, a true Cristian wouldn't support that. A true Christian doesn't hate a gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgendered person. They would respect and love their neighbor regardless of their sexual preference. A Christian doesn't have to agree with their lifestyle choices, but they are in no way permitted to judge or hate someone for those choices.
Sorry but I find this patently laughable. True Christian? Does that mean anyone who doesn't believe in the same interpretation of the bible as you do? I bet there are millions who would point the finger at you and say you are not a true Christian. You both, of course, are wrong as there cannot be any truth in a system based on faith.
Sorry but I find this patently laughable. True Christian? Does that mean anyone who doesn't believe in the same interpretation of the bible as you do? I bet there are millions who would point the finger at you and say you are not a true Christian. You both, of course, are wrong as there cannot be any truth in a system based on faith.
EagerDragon
Jul 12, 12:23 PM
Sounds like these new Mac Pros are going to be expensive.
Very, remeber that they may also have multiple GPU(s).
:D
Very, remeber that they may also have multiple GPU(s).
:D
![vanessa hudgens hair 2011. vanessa hudgens hair up. vanessa hudgens hair 2011.](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgPyErnmT7woEBx9yP6aN-L5BvndeYSMWIyl_O1uot7LrJNQ5QiMoNu1N7ZmfwnpMuF61sMhBqI8pBLweY6DHo6CTc-w6ADeTW3fSse5gAl8J9Gjy9BPoXIWy2A2aY2UzxVvjSOvOKm9mR0/s1600/Hair%2525252BUpdos%2525252B-%2525252BVanessa%2525252BHudgens%2525252BCurly%2525252BUpdos.jpg)
Rt&Dzine
Mar 24, 07:06 PM
"When they express their moral beliefs or beliefs about human nature ... they are stigmatised, and worse -- they are vilified, and prosecuted.
"These attacks are violations of fundamental human rights and cannot be justified under any circumstances," Tomasi said.
As soon as they quit trying to legislate and force their beliefs on the rest of us, the sooner they will be left alone to wallow in their archaic beliefs.
"These attacks are violations of fundamental human rights and cannot be justified under any circumstances," Tomasi said.
As soon as they quit trying to legislate and force their beliefs on the rest of us, the sooner they will be left alone to wallow in their archaic beliefs.
Don't panic
Mar 15, 05:48 PM
afaik it's more designed as a holding pool for fuel rods to be put in and those just recently taken out
the problem seems to be that reactor 4 has been shut off for maintance works, thus many of the normal fuel rods seem to have been taken out of the reactor and put into the basin ... but that is only as far as i heard
information flow has been rather limited because there was night in japan so i suspect the next hours we will get more informations/press releases again
that would make a bit more sense.
![Actress Vanessa Hudgens. vanessa hudgens hair up. Actress Vanessa Hudgens.](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_vAPfrdMW1bZ9oUxXDymO-bUuvigqXMLOiwZC9ro7bT-S8a1ptToIVbJd-M1D1Ttnl0Q7dqSWiaaU_B52yToc2neyNiBucXkwsATB5NsdvVsDzJQZc8E8N1FJihGcdj8THDmJHrQ--rC1UIGsBOxzXepLQy6Q=s0-d)
Actress Vanessa Hudgens.
![vanessa hudgens hair. steviem vanessa hudgens hair up. vanessa hudgens hair. steviem](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgsqw2ePmF55guvxeMhGM-MN3LlJbOqjuyheUOHdpEbrGyxpJvBzP5WVYa4l2h1L4KOZIeDqwcQKza9MeB6B6XeP2C8VuC73vSM-jIT5IYi53l6pr8FTUioEDSbfPzEge_hTpuD9xMWrEg/s640/Vanessa-Hudgens%252525252B%2525252525252810%25252525252529.jpg)
vanessa hudgens hair. steviem
![Vanessa Hudgens : BANGS ? vanessa hudgens hair up. Vanessa Hudgens : BANGS ?](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_t9aX6OVTE0vMehKH7tLXe2IZUwM-5SmJFuFRbbyec5Ta_KpuEKIqjAlos59qr33YuM2Hm10MzeeacitTZjfQrLvabr3Nhd-EhvbqZTZNjE2Rvq=s0-d)
Vanessa Hudgens : BANGS ?
![Vanessa Hudgens Upgrade New vanessa hudgens hair up. Vanessa Hudgens Upgrade New](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_uDu4tP1m8aRVjhXIJevG-N9VC00twKZdQRySaxXUpar7TEZDDrsxnhDte0SOHXWrD_quvlw5lgYES_X_-_ugBWezGgzf04uILdKTDZfzhb9QVnGUCnM4G87KBkBjyhyM7XFHuwk6dAlfdpufk=s0-d)
Vanessa Hudgens Upgrade New
![vanessa hudgens long dresses vanessa hudgens hair up. vanessa hudgens long dresses](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiiwMM10Kz_b-lqMLCx2gHXfdzKsmEEJsEnVirtCiiC-YdjPr1wQ6onRMHersMjB49IdYZeQjohQXfWu3gH1fS0pSgXzUu27Qp1HD63kEbkmVPhRX9SkvsYPWojV9nAFP0bTmx9CRGEEgBs/s1600/vanessa%252525252Bball%252525252Bgown.jpg)
vanessa hudgens long dresses
![Vanessa wore her hair up vanessa hudgens hair up. Vanessa wore her hair up](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_sVgmlhJgIzddkyx__8U75KAdLfu3v3py9kVNJiL1WSaB3B55WjTEx4fzi_NstYSI2fP-twTLF3bYSqnwb4PjCo-9wMiiZDaTm1t6eSV3P_8LMW_kptKUFQ7nI7=s0-d)
Vanessa wore her hair up
the problem seems to be that reactor 4 has been shut off for maintance works, thus many of the normal fuel rods seem to have been taken out of the reactor and put into the basin ... but that is only as far as i heard
information flow has been rather limited because there was night in japan so i suspect the next hours we will get more informations/press releases again
that would make a bit more sense.
levitynyc
Apr 8, 10:37 PM
I got far more enjoyment out of Infinity Blade for 6 dollars than I did out of Pilot Wings Resort 3DS for 40 dollars...just sayin.
![vanessa hudgens hair. steviem vanessa hudgens hair up. vanessa hudgens hair. steviem](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgsqw2ePmF55guvxeMhGM-MN3LlJbOqjuyheUOHdpEbrGyxpJvBzP5WVYa4l2h1L4KOZIeDqwcQKza9MeB6B6XeP2C8VuC73vSM-jIT5IYi53l6pr8FTUioEDSbfPzEge_hTpuD9xMWrEg/s640/Vanessa-Hudgens%252525252B%2525252525252810%25252525252529.jpg)
requieminadream
Apr 8, 11:02 PM
Was the MacNN headline "Apple Poaching Gaming PR Execs from Activision and Nintendo?" the true story? It would give a very different impression if the headline had been "PR Execs Abandoning Activision and Nintendo for Apple?" And in fact the article says that Grange "jumped ship".
Were they pushed or pulled?
Doesn't matter. Apple took in two head gaming executives. Whether they called them up or were called up, they now have major gaming players in their family. It's a pretty clear sign that they will be getting into gaming in some way.
Were they pushed or pulled?
Doesn't matter. Apple took in two head gaming executives. Whether they called them up or were called up, they now have major gaming players in their family. It's a pretty clear sign that they will be getting into gaming in some way.
bobbleheadbob
Apr 9, 10:28 AM
I'd love for Pokemon to be on iOS devices.
My kids would love that, too. Only problem would be trying to get my iPhone or iPad away from them! ;)
My kids would love that, too. Only problem would be trying to get my iPhone or iPad away from them! ;)
ITR 81
Sep 12, 06:13 PM
Now see its a step in the right direction to be sure. There will be features announced which will make it more attractive
But unless they add the ability to attach a hard drive or something to hold content on then this isn't going to sell at all.
You probably forget that iTunes TV shows are not available nowhere else in the world except the US. Neither are the films for the time being. so what do we have to watch in the rest of the world? Nada!
I really want this to be better for launch. Lets see what happens eh?
Next yr is suppose to be all International titles and movies.
And I'm sure the UK will be one of the first to get them.
Well if you look at the image of the iTv it looks all concept looking.
So I would say it probably does have a HD or a CF drive. Other wise I can't see them running Front Row on the damn thing without it.
My idea is Apple releases a sys with most all media centres including a small HD. Next Apple can release add on's...like 100-200GB extra HD or a Blue Ray drive that connect via a FW800 port...or something similar.
But unless they add the ability to attach a hard drive or something to hold content on then this isn't going to sell at all.
You probably forget that iTunes TV shows are not available nowhere else in the world except the US. Neither are the films for the time being. so what do we have to watch in the rest of the world? Nada!
I really want this to be better for launch. Lets see what happens eh?
Next yr is suppose to be all International titles and movies.
And I'm sure the UK will be one of the first to get them.
Well if you look at the image of the iTv it looks all concept looking.
So I would say it probably does have a HD or a CF drive. Other wise I can't see them running Front Row on the damn thing without it.
My idea is Apple releases a sys with most all media centres including a small HD. Next Apple can release add on's...like 100-200GB extra HD or a Blue Ray drive that connect via a FW800 port...or something similar.
![vanessa hudgens long dresses vanessa hudgens hair up. vanessa hudgens long dresses](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiiwMM10Kz_b-lqMLCx2gHXfdzKsmEEJsEnVirtCiiC-YdjPr1wQ6onRMHersMjB49IdYZeQjohQXfWu3gH1fS0pSgXzUu27Qp1HD63kEbkmVPhRX9SkvsYPWojV9nAFP0bTmx9CRGEEgBs/s1600/vanessa%252525252Bball%252525252Bgown.jpg)
Multimedia
Jul 12, 11:33 AM
have to agree with Manik and generik,
Doesn't make business sense to hold out the Macbook with just Yonah when all the other companies will be filling their 13.3/14 laptops with 64bit Meroms as soon as possible. Apple has to compete with the other companies now, and if it doesn't fill Macbook with Merom, it doesnt have a small laptop with latest specs - while its competitors will.
Unless they introduce a smaller Macbook Pro which no one is suggesting. Makes business sense to throw the same price Merom into the Macbook.
Could someone please explain, other than this 'we must make some distinction' between MB and MBP (which already exists) why apple wouldn't put in Meroms into the Macbook asap?I wholeheartedly agree. It's just a question of how soon Apple will pull the trigger on the switch to Merom in mini and MacBook not if they will. I'm not sure Apple thinks they are competing with PC specs yet. But what's the upside to sticking with Yonah in anything until next year? I don't get it. Aren't we better off in the long run retiring Yonah ASAP?
Is it:
1. Low Supply of Meroms until next year?
2. Lower Cost of Yonahs until next year?
Am I out of line for not believing either of the above? I can't understand Apple not wanting to lose Yonah as soon as they can. I don't see anyone buying a different model because one is Yonah and another is Merom. MacBooks are way too different from MacBook Pros in many other ways than their processor's speed and 32/64 bitness. :confused:
I'm confused for now. Maybe we're being too pessimistic about Apple's willingness to drop Yonah ASAP. :confused:
Doesn't make business sense to hold out the Macbook with just Yonah when all the other companies will be filling their 13.3/14 laptops with 64bit Meroms as soon as possible. Apple has to compete with the other companies now, and if it doesn't fill Macbook with Merom, it doesnt have a small laptop with latest specs - while its competitors will.
Unless they introduce a smaller Macbook Pro which no one is suggesting. Makes business sense to throw the same price Merom into the Macbook.
Could someone please explain, other than this 'we must make some distinction' between MB and MBP (which already exists) why apple wouldn't put in Meroms into the Macbook asap?I wholeheartedly agree. It's just a question of how soon Apple will pull the trigger on the switch to Merom in mini and MacBook not if they will. I'm not sure Apple thinks they are competing with PC specs yet. But what's the upside to sticking with Yonah in anything until next year? I don't get it. Aren't we better off in the long run retiring Yonah ASAP?
Is it:
1. Low Supply of Meroms until next year?
2. Lower Cost of Yonahs until next year?
Am I out of line for not believing either of the above? I can't understand Apple not wanting to lose Yonah as soon as they can. I don't see anyone buying a different model because one is Yonah and another is Merom. MacBooks are way too different from MacBook Pros in many other ways than their processor's speed and 32/64 bitness. :confused:
I'm confused for now. Maybe we're being too pessimistic about Apple's willingness to drop Yonah ASAP. :confused:
matticus008
Mar 20, 02:53 PM
The first part of you statement is not a very intelligent one. If you believe a law to be immoral or against the freedom of the people then it is your duty especially in this country to stand up against it, not cower away and create a separate place to dwell. If everyone took your stance then when major changes need to happen to our laws people would have gathered together to leave the country instead of trying to work and fix the problem and raise awareness of the problem.
Yes, they would. Most countries are started because the old one was unjust or inadequate in some regard. Working to change the law is not the same as breaking the law. You have every right to write to your Congressmen, lobby whomever you'd like, and voice your protest against the law. You do not have the right to break it.
Bound? Yes. But that does not mean I abdicate my responsibility to T-H-I-N-K for myself. You seem to be happy letting those who pass laws think for you. I care about my own life and sanity a bit too much to let others tell me how to live. Thank you very much.
You can think for yourself all you like, but the law is still the law. If you choose to break it, then you choose to break it, but that does NOT make the law irrelevant. You are breaking the law. That is my only point.
Glad you belive this junk. I don't. but then, I think for myself. You do make me laugh with the whole "protect the weak" nonsense. Let me guess, the RIAA are protecting the weak again those strong 13 year-olds who want to listen to free music. Riiiiight.
PS: Your basic social theory has led to a world order ruled by the strong over the weak
If you'd read more carefully, you would see that I didn't say that we aren't living in a society dominated by the strong. You would see that I was pointing out that no laws at all would make the situation even worse. The RIAA is not the government or the law. They might have successfully lobbied for it, but the law is well within their rights as the owners of the music. Take a step back and look at the rest of the law. Are murderers caught and taken away? When people steal something from you, are they not caught and not prosecuted? Do people regularly go around, shooting and stealing, with no one to stop them? The answer might be "sometimes," but with your "think for yourself attitude" the answer would be "all the time." People would do whatever they had the power to do, because there would be no consequences and no one to protect the weak at all. The main point of that part of my answer was to point out your argument failure: the fallacy of argument from ignorance (that your own evidence can be used AGAINST you, rendering it invalid).
By that logic, women would still not be able to vote. Look at other societies that do not allow people to protest "unjust" laws. Compare where they stand to where we stand. I am simply trying to take us further still down the road of freedom for all humans. Anything that acts to restrict the natural association of humans is a Bad Thing�. DRM, by definition, falls into this category.
That, sir, is a load of crap. The law allowed only men above 21 to vote. Women were not covered in that. Therefore, the rights of women were constricted. This is not the case. You have "fair use" laws, and DRM laws to protect fair use. The DRM laws do not narrow your scope of access to those "fair use" laws--and if you have a problem with fair use, bring it up with someone who will do something about it. You also don't live in a society where you are not allowed to protest. Sit ins and marches during the Civil Rights movement were entirely legal forms of protest for the most part. "Anything that acts to restrict the natural association of humans" is NOT a bad thing. Again, the reason we have society is because we have rule of law. Restrictions on actions protect the freedoms of others who cannot secure those freedoms on their own. DRM has nothing to do with "the natural association of humans," either, so I don't know where you're going here.
Again, I am bound by these laws but I do not need to AGREE with them. Do you agree with them? [That is a direct question btw.]
All actions (free or not free) require sacrifices. So what is your point?
It doesn't matter whether you agree with them or not. You don't have the right to break them. I do believe in the law, I believe DRM protects artists in theory, and I do not believe that people have any excuse for breaking the law in this case. It is not a social injustice, it is not a repressive law, and it is not your natural right to do whatever you want with something that does not belong to you (the music of others). I believe that DRM is flawed because not every stereo, car, computer, music player, cell phone, PDA, internet appliance, and jukebox in existence is compatible with one another, making it difficult to listen to your music in all of those environments. But the competition is the best form of "free association" available: you're given a choice how to get your music. Not all of it works with all of your devices, but that part is up to you. If I buy a book written in Russian, it's my fault that I can't read Russian and assuming I can't translate it (which is very time consuming), I have to buy it again in English. That's the way it is, and it doesn't infringe on anyone's freedoms.
Option C (Something Different): Think for yourself and live life according to your own laws
I will take C cuz it allows for both A & B while reserving my ability to think for myself.
Neither options A nor B restrict your ability to think for yourself. What option C does is make you liable to punishment and prosecution. Live life how you feel is best, but understand that if and when you choose to break a law (we all do it, and speeding is a perfect example), you might benefit from it, but you also have to prepared to pay the fines when you get caught. Do I really care about people stealing music? No, I'm not the RIAA. Do I think it's ridiculous that people can rationalize it to the point where they think they're entitled to it, or that it's acceptable to break the law for their own convenience, or worst of all, that they're not really even breaking a law? Abso-freaking-lutely.
Yes, they would. Most countries are started because the old one was unjust or inadequate in some regard. Working to change the law is not the same as breaking the law. You have every right to write to your Congressmen, lobby whomever you'd like, and voice your protest against the law. You do not have the right to break it.
Bound? Yes. But that does not mean I abdicate my responsibility to T-H-I-N-K for myself. You seem to be happy letting those who pass laws think for you. I care about my own life and sanity a bit too much to let others tell me how to live. Thank you very much.
You can think for yourself all you like, but the law is still the law. If you choose to break it, then you choose to break it, but that does NOT make the law irrelevant. You are breaking the law. That is my only point.
Glad you belive this junk. I don't. but then, I think for myself. You do make me laugh with the whole "protect the weak" nonsense. Let me guess, the RIAA are protecting the weak again those strong 13 year-olds who want to listen to free music. Riiiiight.
PS: Your basic social theory has led to a world order ruled by the strong over the weak
If you'd read more carefully, you would see that I didn't say that we aren't living in a society dominated by the strong. You would see that I was pointing out that no laws at all would make the situation even worse. The RIAA is not the government or the law. They might have successfully lobbied for it, but the law is well within their rights as the owners of the music. Take a step back and look at the rest of the law. Are murderers caught and taken away? When people steal something from you, are they not caught and not prosecuted? Do people regularly go around, shooting and stealing, with no one to stop them? The answer might be "sometimes," but with your "think for yourself attitude" the answer would be "all the time." People would do whatever they had the power to do, because there would be no consequences and no one to protect the weak at all. The main point of that part of my answer was to point out your argument failure: the fallacy of argument from ignorance (that your own evidence can be used AGAINST you, rendering it invalid).
By that logic, women would still not be able to vote. Look at other societies that do not allow people to protest "unjust" laws. Compare where they stand to where we stand. I am simply trying to take us further still down the road of freedom for all humans. Anything that acts to restrict the natural association of humans is a Bad Thing�. DRM, by definition, falls into this category.
That, sir, is a load of crap. The law allowed only men above 21 to vote. Women were not covered in that. Therefore, the rights of women were constricted. This is not the case. You have "fair use" laws, and DRM laws to protect fair use. The DRM laws do not narrow your scope of access to those "fair use" laws--and if you have a problem with fair use, bring it up with someone who will do something about it. You also don't live in a society where you are not allowed to protest. Sit ins and marches during the Civil Rights movement were entirely legal forms of protest for the most part. "Anything that acts to restrict the natural association of humans" is NOT a bad thing. Again, the reason we have society is because we have rule of law. Restrictions on actions protect the freedoms of others who cannot secure those freedoms on their own. DRM has nothing to do with "the natural association of humans," either, so I don't know where you're going here.
Again, I am bound by these laws but I do not need to AGREE with them. Do you agree with them? [That is a direct question btw.]
All actions (free or not free) require sacrifices. So what is your point?
It doesn't matter whether you agree with them or not. You don't have the right to break them. I do believe in the law, I believe DRM protects artists in theory, and I do not believe that people have any excuse for breaking the law in this case. It is not a social injustice, it is not a repressive law, and it is not your natural right to do whatever you want with something that does not belong to you (the music of others). I believe that DRM is flawed because not every stereo, car, computer, music player, cell phone, PDA, internet appliance, and jukebox in existence is compatible with one another, making it difficult to listen to your music in all of those environments. But the competition is the best form of "free association" available: you're given a choice how to get your music. Not all of it works with all of your devices, but that part is up to you. If I buy a book written in Russian, it's my fault that I can't read Russian and assuming I can't translate it (which is very time consuming), I have to buy it again in English. That's the way it is, and it doesn't infringe on anyone's freedoms.
Option C (Something Different): Think for yourself and live life according to your own laws
I will take C cuz it allows for both A & B while reserving my ability to think for myself.
Neither options A nor B restrict your ability to think for yourself. What option C does is make you liable to punishment and prosecution. Live life how you feel is best, but understand that if and when you choose to break a law (we all do it, and speeding is a perfect example), you might benefit from it, but you also have to prepared to pay the fines when you get caught. Do I really care about people stealing music? No, I'm not the RIAA. Do I think it's ridiculous that people can rationalize it to the point where they think they're entitled to it, or that it's acceptable to break the law for their own convenience, or worst of all, that they're not really even breaking a law? Abso-freaking-lutely.
flopticalcube
Apr 24, 12:40 PM
There are hells (known as "naraga") in Hinduism and Buddhism too, but none of them are eternal and all of them are only for people who have done really bad things in life - regardless of faith or lack thereof.
Christian believers who are enslaved by their fear of hell, as opposed to having their faith based on genuine love to God, will allegedly end up in hell anyway.
I was always under the impression that reincarnation was considered a kind of living hell, like reliving Junior High School over and over again.
The fire and brimstone of hell certainly figures in a lot of the fundamentalist sects of Christianity and many of the Protestant ones too. My father-in-law is a presbyterian lay preacher and constantly prattled on about it.
Christian believers who are enslaved by their fear of hell, as opposed to having their faith based on genuine love to God, will allegedly end up in hell anyway.
I was always under the impression that reincarnation was considered a kind of living hell, like reliving Junior High School over and over again.
The fire and brimstone of hell certainly figures in a lot of the fundamentalist sects of Christianity and many of the Protestant ones too. My father-in-law is a presbyterian lay preacher and constantly prattled on about it.
citizenzen
Apr 26, 03:19 PM
Miraculous cure in Lourdes, France?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKMF059m29Y&feature=related
Eucharistie miracles?
In the Vatican
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SfXvMlb8u0&feature=related
In Lanciano, Italy.
http://therealpresence.org/eucharst/mir/english_pdf/Lanciano1.pdf
http://therealpresence.org/eucharst/mir/english_pdf/Lanciano2.pdf
You gotta do better than youtube videos. I can use youtube to prove Bigfoot (http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Bigfoot&aq=f), Mothman (http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=mothman&aq=f), and chupacabras. (http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=chupacabra&aq=0s&oq=Chupra)
Can you cite anything verified scientifically?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKMF059m29Y&feature=related
Eucharistie miracles?
In the Vatican
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SfXvMlb8u0&feature=related
In Lanciano, Italy.
http://therealpresence.org/eucharst/mir/english_pdf/Lanciano1.pdf
http://therealpresence.org/eucharst/mir/english_pdf/Lanciano2.pdf
You gotta do better than youtube videos. I can use youtube to prove Bigfoot (http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Bigfoot&aq=f), Mothman (http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=mothman&aq=f), and chupacabras. (http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=chupacabra&aq=0s&oq=Chupra)
Can you cite anything verified scientifically?
ClimbingTheLog
Sep 12, 03:58 PM
I would rather have seen a mac mini with core 2 duo, better graphics support, an internal 3.5" hard drive, and HDMI.
Don't count it out, but that's not a mass-market machine worth pre-announcing.
Don't count it out, but that's not a mass-market machine worth pre-announcing.
Rodimus Prime
Mar 13, 11:50 PM
Why can't people get away from the concept of a centralized power source, like a coal or nuclear plant or even a wind farm to generate their national needs? I even see arguments that 'we don't have the space' for alternative power. Look at an aerial photo of any city and all you see is miles and miles of dead empty blank rooves. Solar panels or even small wind turbines on every single roof in every city will have people either reducing their reliance on a central power source or even contributing their own electricity to the grid to the point you may not even need a central power source, or maybe just one - which could be a wind farm or a nice clean geothermal plant.
I sure as hell would not want wind turbines on the roof of houses. The noise from them would drive me insane.
I am a fan of putting solar cells on the roof of houses and then the excess power is sold back to the grid. That helps reduce it by a fair amount. Not that it would work in a large part of the country due to not being cost effective. You need to be farther south for it to really be worth it and have fair amount of sun shine.
biggest thing is we need more efficiency out of what we have. HVAC is some of the biggest power draining system and improve those and it greatly improves the over all system.
I sure as hell would not want wind turbines on the roof of houses. The noise from them would drive me insane.
I am a fan of putting solar cells on the roof of houses and then the excess power is sold back to the grid. That helps reduce it by a fair amount. Not that it would work in a large part of the country due to not being cost effective. You need to be farther south for it to really be worth it and have fair amount of sun shine.
biggest thing is we need more efficiency out of what we have. HVAC is some of the biggest power draining system and improve those and it greatly improves the over all system.
Ravich
May 3, 08:40 PM
All this over someone not even intelligent enough to title their "manual installation required" malware 'security update for Snow Leopard'
I like how the solution is basically "delete it"
I like how the solution is basically "delete it"
No comments:
Post a Comment